| Finding | Assessment |
|---|---|
| 5-Year Stock Return | ~$140→$206 (+47%). TTM OP +47% (~$9.0B→$13.2B), operating non-GAAP basis. P/E(ttm) stable ~16–17x (range ~9–28x). |
| Business Model | Software-led hybrid cloud + AI. Software ~45%, Consulting ~31%, Infrastructure ~22%. ARR $24.6B (+8%). |
| Competitive Moat | NARROW Mainframe lock-in (6-8 nines uptime), Red Hat OpenShift $2B ARR, watsonx for regulated AI. Consulting faces AI automation risk. |
| Past 5-YR Drivers | Software pivot (Red Hat, HashiCorp, Confluent), Z17 strongest mainframe cycle ever (+48%), $4.5B AI productivity savings. |
| Recent Stock Move | $206, down ~27% from the ~$281 June-30 close on the pre-announced Q2 miss (deals slipped). P/E(ttm) 17x. Deferred, not lost — about a third re-closed in early Q3. |
| Revenue Trend | ACCELERATING Rev YoY: 1% (Q2 2026) → 3% (Q3 2026E). |
| Margin Trend | FLAT OM%: 19% (Q2 2026) → 19% (Q3 2026E). |
| TTM OP Trajectory | FLAT TTM OP QoQ: 1% (Q2 2026) → 1% (Q3 2026E). TTM OP $13.2B. |
| Key Opportunities | AI orchestration/governance (watsonx Orchestrate + Red Hat neutrality). Recurring software compounding (ARR $24.6B +8%, ~80% recurring, Red Hat +11%). Quantum ($10B, fault-tolerant 2029) + z17/Spyre + Lightwell. |
| Key Risks | Execution/deal-timing risk (the Q2 ELA/mainframe slippage). Slow ~4–5% growth + mainframe cyclicality (TP −9%, IBM Z −42%). AI-orchestration thesis unproven at scale; hyperscaler/SaaS competition. |
| Catalysts | Re-close of slipped deals + FY +4–5% cc execution. 100bps operating-margin expansion + FCF +$1B. z17 cycle (~130% prog-to-prog) + Distributed Infra (+37%). Quantum milestones; Lightwell adoption. |
| P/E(ttm) Valuation | 17x for a low-growth but high-FCF (80%+ conversion), ~80%-recurring-software name with a ~4% dividend — reasonable to cheap after the ~27% drop. Re-rates higher if slipped demand returns; downside if growth stalls. |
| Segment | Q2 2026 Revenue | % of Total | Key Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software | $7,761M | 45% | +5%. Red Hat/Hybrid Cloud +11%, Data +18% cc, Automation +3%, Transaction Processing −9%. ARR $24.6B (+8%); ~80% recurring. |
| Consulting | $5,327M | 31% | +1% cc. Signings +6%; GenAI ~50% of signings, >30% of backlog. |
| Infrastructure | $3,835M | 22% | −7%. IBM Z −42% (deals slipped) but z17 ~130% prog-to-prog; Distributed Infra +37% record, $500M backlog. |
| Financing | $186M | 1% | Captive financing; 80% investment-grade receivables portfolio. |
Key metrics: Software ARR $24.6B (+10%). Red Hat OpenShift $2B ARR. Virtualization contracts $600M+ since 2024. GenAI book of business $6B+ cumulative. Consulting backlog ~30% GenAI. Z17 outperforming all prior programs. Cash $11.8B. Key competitors: Microsoft, Oracle, Accenture, ServiceNow, Salesforce.
Open-source communities (Linux, K8s)
Semiconductor R&D (Z processors)
AI research (foundation models)
Acquisitions (Confluent, HashiCorp)
Software (Red Hat, watsonx, Data, Automation)
Consulting (strategy, app modernization)
Infrastructure (Z mainframe, Power, Storage)
Security (Concert, QRadar)
$24.6B Software ARR, 6B+ GenAI book
Banks & financial services
Healthcare & life sciences
Government & defense
Telecommunications
Manufacturing & retail
| Q2 2024 | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 | Q1 2025 | Q2 2025 | Q3 2025 | Q4 2025 | Q1 2026 | Q2 2026 | Q3 2026E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarter End | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 | Sep 2026 |
| Stock Price | $175 | $221 | $220 | $249 | $295 | $282 | $296 | $242 | $281 | $206 |
| Stock QoQ | -8% | +26% | -1% | +13% | +19% | -4% | +5% | -18% | +16% | -27% |
| Rev YoY | 2% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 8% | 9% | 12% | 9% | 1% | 3% |
| OM% | 18% | 17% | 24% | 12% | 19% | 19% | 24% | 13% | 19% | 19% |
| R40 (Rev YoY + OM%) | 20% | 18% | 25% | 12% | 26% | 28% | 36% | 23% | 20% | 22% |
| TTM OP ($M) | $10,916 | $11,104 | $11,208 | $11,288 | $11,693 | $12,239 | $12,713 | $13,104 | $13,197 | $13,291 |
| TTM OP QoQ | +4% | +2% | +1% | +1% | +4% | +5% | +4% | +3% | +1% | +1% |
| FCF/OP ttm | 110% | 107% | 104% | 105% | 99% | 93% | 85% | 89% | 97% | 101% |
| Debt/EBITDA | 3.4x | 3.1x | 3.0x | 3.4x | 3.3x | 3.2x | 3.0x | 3.2x | 3.1x | 3.1x |
| P/E ttm | 17x | 21x | 21x | 24x | 28x | 26x | 26x | 20x | 23x | 17x |
| Q4'21 | Q1'22 | Q2'22 | Q3'22 | Q4'22 | Q1'23 | Q2'23 | Q3'23 | Q4'23 | Q1'24 | Q2'24 | Q3'24 | Q4'24 | Q1'25 | Q2'25 | Q3'25 | Q4'25 | Q1'26 | Q2'26 | Q3'26E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarter End | Dec21 | Mar22 | Jun22 | Sep22 | Dec22 | Mar23 | Jun23 | Sep23 | Dec23 | Mar24 | Jun24 | Sep24 | Dec24 | Mar25 | Jun25 | Sep25 | Dec25 | Mar26 | Jun26 | Sep26 |
| R40 > 40% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| R40 accelerate | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |||||||
| TTM OP QoQ > 10% | ✅ | |||||||||||||||||||
| TTM OP QoQ accelerate | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |||||||||||||
| TTM FCF/OP > 60% | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Debt/EBITDA < 3.5 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Total passes | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Stock QoQ | +1% | -3% | +9% | -16% | +19% | -7% | +2% | +5% | +15% | +18% | -8% | +26% | -1% | +13% | +19% | -4% | +5% | -18% | +16% | -27% |
| P/E ttm | 13x | 14x | 15x | 13x | 15x | 14x | 15x | 15x | 17x | 19x | 17x | 21x | 21x | 24x | 28x | 26x | 26x | 20x | 23x | 17x |
Note: IBM’s low revenue growth rate means R40 never exceeds 40% and TTM OP QoQ rarely exceeds 10%. The scorecard captures financial health and directional improvement more than absolute growth levels.